Monday, April 23, 2012

The Death Penalty Box

Did you know that if you kill a man in St. Louis you could be executed for the crime, but if you kill the same man across the river in East St. Louis, you will only go to prison? States with capital punishment are very pro-choice. Among 37 states, there are 5 different methods of execution in use, allowing the condemned to choose between the chair, the rope, the needle, the gas chamber, or a firing squad. The Death Penalty stirs strong emotional feelings on both sides. Abolitionists claim that since man did not create life, it's therefore not his to take, without exception. Advocates say that is a deterrent to violent crime and the ultimate justice for its victims. George Carlin said that death was more than just a penalty. A penalty is something that happens in hockey. Death is a bit more permanent. I have given this issue a great deal of thought. I have looked at it from Judaeo-Christian-Zen-Hindu points of view, including the consideration of both karmic laws and state laws. I have contemplated its inhumanity and whatever is the philosophical opposite when it comes to putting a person to death. I have examined the costs and the morality. I have perused the holy texts, including the Bhagavad Gita, and I have come to agree with the wisdom of my Texas cousins: "Some people just need killin'."

I know that admission may shock some of my progressive friends, but I'm conflicted here. I realize that the Christian point of view ought to be no executions, no exceptions, because Jesus Himself stopped one. I guess stoning was a particularly cruel manner of capital punishment, depending on the size of the rocks, but Jesus said, "Let him who is without sin cast the first stone." Then again, the Old Testament calls for "an eye for an eye." So many conservatives cheered for Texas Governor Rick Perry's heavyweight championship of execution during the Republican debates, it's an ongoing spiritual mystery how so many Rock of Ages absolutists can be both pro-life yet also favor the death penalty. Irrespective of the fervor of the faithful, if karma works in the same way as the laws of cause and effect, and someone has committed a crime so horrible that he will return to this life with some type of deformity, we'd be doing him a favor to give him a little nudge along the path of his spiritual journey.

Everyday, I see someone walk out of prison that was on death row. Advances in forensics and other technologies have freed men held captive for decades while others have surely been wrongly put to death. In Texas, they do it for a hobby, like hot dog eaters trying to get into the Guinness Book of World Records. On the other hand, Charles Manson may well have reached cult-like status anyway if the death penalty were not eliminated in California in 1972, but he wouldn't have stayed alive long enough to record new CDs and become this country's convict with the most correspondence. I doubt that John Wayne Gacey's paintings would still be on the market if he hadn't spent that much time in prison in order to paint them all. The most egregious example is Richard Speck, the mass murderer. Speck's was the first particularly horrifying mass slaying to be made public during the media age. In 1966, Speck raped, tortured and murdered eight student nurses in their beds at their Chicago apartment. He was quickly captured and sentenced to death, but a Supreme Court decision created a four year moratorium on state execution, under which Speck's life was spared. He later claimed he never really had a reason to kill those girls and that it was so messy, if he could go back, it would just be a simple house burglary.

If there were ever a candidate for capital punishment, it would be Richard Speck. But the evidence was not necessarily in the trial so much as in the prison video Speck made before he died of natural causes at age 50. The footage is still so gag-inducing, it makes me ill to conjure the memory, but without being expansive, Speck is featured snorting coke with his jail lover and showing off new surgically enlarged man-breasts. He says to the "videographer," "If the public only knew how much fun we're having." At that point, I stopped caring about deterrence, or cost, or philosophy, or ethics; I just wished that guy was dead. But, "Vengeance is Mine," sayeth the Lord. Fair enough. But it's also said, "The Lord helps those who help themselves." Face it, there are some people that are just dying to meet their maker, and doing it in so gruesome a way that we, as a society, need to accommodate them. These times in which we live, (the Kali Yuga in Hindi), are so dark that violent crimes have become increasingly brutal, depraved and committed with such savagery, that the perpetrators have forfeited their right to live on this planet and breathe the same air as other humans. Game over. Thanks for playing. Better luck next time.

The 1972 case that stopped all executions for a time was called Furman v. Georgia. It wasn't because of a rigged trial or planted evidence, the court merely ruled that a more uniform system about what did and did not qualify for the death penalty needed to be put in place. So, let's merely follow the court's ruling and narrow the criteria for the ultimate punishment. This would, of necessity, have to be a federal law, just to overrule the "try 'em and fry 'em" regimen of some of our more trigger happy states. To my mother's regret, I am not an attorney, but I'll bet that some legal statutes could be written on a national level, like the voting age, that regulate the conditions necessary for and the method of execution. Leaving a matter of this magnitude to the states has created the chaos we are currently witnessing. I once believed that the correct solution was not to kill the murderers, just lock them in a cage like mad dogs. Forget about rehabilitation or exercise, just slide their food under a crack in the door and let nature do its work. But in recent decades, a category of soulless criminal has emerged that just doesn't deserve any more food and water. For example- anyone committing a mass slaying or spree killing is good to go; anybody that tortures and murders for kicks is hot to trot; serial child predators win a free ticket to the afterlife, including the clergy. Now that might serve as a deterrent.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

You forgot a big one which is Genesis 9:6..."Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made man." This is because in killing a human being, a murderer demonstrates his contempt for God as well as for his fellow man. If you don't like it, shake your fist in God's face. He made the rule. This spiritual law has never been rescinded in spite of what some may say to the contrary. However, a good case can be made that capital punishment is ordained by God only for pre-meditated murder. This would exclude capital punishment for any other crime...such as treason, rape, etc. In the case of those religions which believe in reincarnation such as Buddhism, Hinduism, New Age, etc., what is the big deal with regard to capital punishment? These religions believe that the murderer will be spiritually re-tooled on the 'other side' and will reincarnate much less likely to be a murderer. So, why would capital punishment be a big issue? The perp is dismissed, re-educated, and comes back as a more responsible member of society. Why put that off? As far as atheists are concerned, what does it matter when, why, or how a person dies? They just return to the elements from which they came...end of story. Might as well die at the age of two as at the age of 82. After you are gone there is only absolute nothingness, so screw the world. Besides, atheists generally don't believe in morality except for pragmatic reasons. Why be an overly moralistic blob of future nothingness-to-be? Nothingness has no memory and doesn't regret or rejoice. The money that it takes to warehouse these predators could be better spent at St. Jude, or any facility which is designed to enhance the lives of the young, or anyone else for that matter. How can anyone argue with this, especially if you have seen the way that violent criminals deport themselves in prison. Why pay hard earned money to prolong atrocious lifestyles...like Richard Speck for instance? He did nothing but take drugs and get screwed in the ass by his black lover. I am much more concerned about the horror and suffering brought upon the innocent victims. I would rather spend the money on alleviating human suffering than to prolong a degenerate's life so that he can be fucked in the ass a few more times. Finally, Sput has done it again. Just when I think that he is an incurable liberal idealogue, he says something to prove me wrong. I give him a standing ovation for having the courage to stand against one of the fundamental sacred cows of his liberal homies. That shows both integrity and courage. If he keeps this up I will have to eat a lot of my words in his regard. I don't mind admitting that I was wrong about him.

Alexander Fleming said...

Praise! From Caesar!

Judgement Day said...

Who says that capital punishment doesn't reduce recidivism? Those who are capitally punished never commit more crimes. As far as the others go, it deters some and doesn't deter others. If there were no capital punishment, those who are deterred by it would no longer be deterred. I agree that the money saved by not warehousing murderers in prison could be put to better use by expending that money on our youth and our seniors. Liberals don't like to acknowledge this, but some people are sub-human. There is more to being human than morphology and anatomy. Remember Hitler and Stalin? Remember the monsters in Connecticut that raped and butchered a doctor's wife and daughters? They burned the daughters alive. Are any of you going to boo-hoo when they are eliminated. If so, maybe it can be arranged for some other monsters to torture your loved ones to death. I know that there are extremists who say that they would not harm a criminal even if they were to kill their families before there very eyes. What would they do if they were to look into their wife's or daughter's pleading eyes while they are being butchered? Smile, shrug their shoulders, and say that fighting back isn't the liberal thing to do?

A Voice Crying In the Wilderness said...

"Abolitionists claim that since man did not create life, it's therefore not his to take, without exception." Well, in Ge.9:6 the One who did create life says differently, so who are we to believe? Crackpots who make up their own theology, or the One who is the very embodiment of theology? I'll bet my eternal soul on the later.

A Patriot said...

Rock of Ages absolutists can be both pro-life AND favor the death penalty because of Ge. 9:6. See how simple things can be when you pay attention to something besides the Bhagavad Gita? At least give the Bible a little bit of creedence. One more thing, the statement that "God helps those who help themselves", did not come from the Bible. Some attribute the saying to ancient Greek writings and some to Ben Franklin. By the way, I'll bet that your Texas relatives are not very liberal. They can't be all bad. All of that being said, I appreciate the conclusion that you came to. I had an uncle who was a pointy-headed, ivory tower liberal. In his middle years, he chaired the department of American literature and philosophy at a prominent mid-west university. He was mugged and robbed by some miscreant and that cured him of much of his liberalism. Another thing that let some of the liberal air out of his balloon was witnessing the horrific damage done to Native Americans who were caught up in the reservation system. His university was near some Indian rservations. He was appalled at what his liberal credo could do to the human spirit. He just had to climb down from his ivory tower and get a taste of real life. I suspect that if more liberals had there loved ones tortured and eviscerated by the objects of their compassion they would cool their liberal jets quite a bit. Something similar happened to this former flaming liberal about 40 years ago. And then kept happening.

performs said...

Only God, the Creator, can truly love each and every single person, without reservation. God is Love and is ultimately responsible for everyone and everything. This is because God is in everyone and everything--all-pervading Being. Subhumans, by the way, are animals, plants, and minerals, not humans who act inhumanely, for every human will both succeed and fail in their earthly careers to live up to their potential.

My take on humanity’s responsibility toward one another is not to punish, torture or kill those who fail to act humanely, but to try as best one can to exercise forgiveness, understanding, and treat an offender in ways to aid and encourage them in penitence. These are ways of loving God. There are times, of course, when killing someone while defending those being harmed by him/her is quite practical and appropriate. But this should be done without hatred. This is something one can aspire to not be expected to do naturally.

It is easy and natural to love those whom we cannot hate. But loving God can only begin with loving those whom we cannot love. Sure, this may be rare, difficult and even seem impossible in some cases. However, as God is ultimately responsible for this Show, any effort one is drawn to make is blessed by God’s all-powerful love, grace and guidance. One can read inspirational stories saints and other heroes who dare to enter this path.

I think the state should be more principled rather than less. Giving the benefit of the doubt, not seeking to punish, torture, or kill someone unnecessarily are expressions of love that is the remedy to our problems. We can turn away from the animalistic alpha male behavior that continues to gain popular support. If the state sanctions these alpha male behaviors why would not its citizens be more apt to behave similarly? I say, let us dare to raise the bar not go down the tubes.

Judgement Day said...

The Christian God is a God of both love AND judgement. Salvation is completely free, but it must be appropriated. Those who refuse the offer go to a godless abode when they die. That is just, because the offer of an eternity with God has been refused by one's own free will. In the end, there is no one to blame but oneself. This doesn't set well with lots of people, so they go in search of foreign 'gods' who supposedly offer better deals. If Christians are wrong then they either enter nothingness at death, or they are reincarnated. If the others are wrong they go to the godless abode through their own choice. A godless abode is one which is utterly and completely devoid of the blessings and protection of God. In other words, unmitigated evil reigns and things go from worse to worst ad infinitum. There is no bottom to the Abyss. One at least should take a hard look at the issue. Once one enters the godless abode there is no turning back. Ouch! What a sickening relaization to have to live with forever. Sort of like the ultimate "I could have had a V-8".

performs said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47Kyr6udl3c&feature=youtu.be